for completed actions

Exercises

Other terminology: aspectual particle ""

1. When should I use it?

When you want to express that an action is completed. Normally should be placed after main verbs or at the end of sentences.

HE

măi le

BUYLE

sān zhāng piào

THREE ZHANG TICKETS

He has bought 3 tickets.

SHE

băjiŭ ná lái le

BA WINETAKE (TOWARDS)LE

She has brought the wine.

2. When should I place the at the end of a sentence, and when should I place it after the main verb of a sentence?

1. If the object of a sentence is a simple one i.e. a noun, which is not attached to a number

and measure word, and not attached to a descriptive clause ( clause), can be placed at the end of the sentence. In this case the particle has many functions: it may indicate the completed action, or a change of situation, it may also indicate an imminent action.

s. v. o. le

wŏmen chī fàn le

.

WEEAT MEAL LE

We have eaten.. [Completed action]

Now we are eating. (We didn't eat before.) [Change of situation]

We are about to eat. ( .)

3. Is it incorrect if I place after the verb in a simple-object sentence?

No, it is not incorrect, but it seems as if the sentence is not yet finished. It may look like the first clause of the verb......construction. For example (Also see pattern 5.),

tāchī le fàn... (jiùqù kàndiànyĭng)

... ( .)

HEEAT LE MEAL... (JIU GO SEE FILM)

After he finishes the meal...(he'll go to see a film.)

4. Can I place at the end of a sentence that has a complex object?

No. If the object of a sentence is a complicated one, i.e. it is preceded by a number word and measure word, or a descriptive clause, is placed after the main verb of the sentence.

s. v. le num.mw. o.

tā chī le liăng wăn fàn

.

HEEATLE TWO BOWLSRICE

He has eaten two bowls of rice.

5. Where should I place if a sentence has a time measure?

If an action is attached to a time measure (e.g., duration , length of time) or an action measure (e.g., many times), is placed after the main verb. The following three alternative patterns share the same feature, that is, they have after the main verbs.

s. v. le tm.(am.)de o. (le)

HE

xué le liăng niánde zhōngwén (le)

(*)

STUDY LE TWO YEAR DE CHINESE (LE)

He studied Chinese for 2 years.

s. v. o. v. le tm.(am.) (le)

tā xué zhōngwén

xué le liăng niăn (le)

()

o. s.v. le tm.(am.) (le)

zhōngwén tā

nà ge diànyĭng wŏ

那个

xuéle liăng niăn (le)

()

kàn le liăng biàn (le)

(**)

I have watched that film twice.

nà shì wŭ nián qián de shì le wŏmenshì duō nián delăo péngyou le

是五 . 我们 .

THAT IS FIVE YEAR AGO DE MATTER LE WE ARE MANY YEARS DE OLD FRIEND LE

That incident happened 5 years ago We have been old friend for many years.

6. Is a time measure placed after in a negative sentence?

No, negative sentences of this kind are normally in a different word order. The time-measure should be placed before the negation. For instance, if you want to say: "I haven't eaten Chinese food for ages." It should be in the following word order:

s. tm. neg. v. o. le

I

hăo jiŭ

LONG TIME

méi

NOT

chī zhōngguó cài le

EAT CHINESE FOOD LE

I haven’t eaten Chinese food for a long time.

7. Do I have to put the time-measures before in all negative sentences?

No. If you want to deny an affirmative statement which has a time-measure, then the time-measure should be placed after the main verb.

s. neg. v. tm. o.

wŏ méi xué sān nián zhōngwén, wŏ zhĭ xué le liăng nián

, 只学 .

I NOTLEARN3 YEAR CHINESE, I ONLY LEARN LE 2 YEAR)

I didn't learn Chinese for 3 years, I only did for 2 years.

8. Do I have to put after every verb in a sentence, if the sentence has a sequence of actions?

If a sequence of actions in the sentence are completed, is usually placed after the last verb of the sentence.

s. v.1 o.1 v.2 le (tm. ) o.2

HE

qù zhōngguó

GO CHINA

xué le sì nián jīngjù

STUDYLE FOUR YEAR PEKING OPERA

He went to China to study Peking opera for 4 years.

HE

qù zhōngguó

GO CHINA

măi le cí qì

瓷器

BUY LE CHINA

He went to China and bought some China.

If you leave at the end of sentences, it normally indicates a change of the situation. Let's compare the following two sentences:

1. (Completed action) tā qù zhōngguó xué le zhōngwén

他去中 .

HE GO CHINA STUDY LE CHINESE

He went to China and studied Chinese.

2. (Change of situation) tā qù zhōngguóxuézhōngwén le

他去中 .

HE GO CHINA STUDY CHINESELE

He has gone to China to study Chinese. (He's not here)

9. Do I always have to place after the last verb of a sentence when describing a sequence of actions?

No. There is another sentence pattern, which indicates sequence of actions, but the first sequence in the sentence is conditional. In this sentence pattern is placed after the first verb which is in the conditional clause, and the adverb is placed before the second verb of the sentence. This kind of construction has a sense of urgency, which means that the action in the clause takes place immediately after the completion of the first action.

s. v.1 le o.1 jiu v.2 o.2

tā dào le zhōngguó jiù zhăo péngyou.

.

HE ARRIVE LE CHINAJIULOOK FOR FRIEND

He'll look for friend immediately after he arrives in China.

As you can see, that sentence describes the action in future, but if you place another at the end of the sentence, then it means that both actions have taken place.

10. Do I always have to use to indicate a completed action?

No, not always. First of all, the particle for completed action is not used in negative sentences. Instead should be placed before the main verb of the sentence.

s. meiv. o.

tā méi chī fàn.

.

HENOT EAT MEAL

He didn't eat the meal.

11. Apart from the negation, are there any circumstances in which is not used?

In the following situations the particle for completed actions is not used.

1. is not used for prolonged and regular actions in the past. In other words, if the sentence contains words such as 每天,年年,常常... the particle for the completed action is not used.

wŏ yĭqián zài zhōngguó jiāoshū

我以 .

I IN THE PASTINCHINA TEACH

I taught in China in the past.

qùnián wŏ chángchánggēn wŏ nǚ péngyouqù kàn diànyĭng

去年 .

LAST YEAR I OFTEN WITH MY GIRLFRIEND GO SEE FILMS

Last year I often went to see films with my girlfriend.

2. is not used in sentences which have modal verbs such as 应该, (dei), 可以, , , , , or for verbs which indicate feelings such as ,喜欢, 觉得, 知道, 愿意, .

zuótiān nĭ yīnggāiqù kàn tā

昨天 应该 .

YESTERDAY YOUSHOULD GO SEE HIM

You should've gone to see him yesterday.

shí nián yĭqián tā hĕn xĭihuānchī făguó cài

十年 以前 法国 .

TEN YEAR AGOSHE VERYLIKE EAT FRENCHFOOD

Ten years ago she liked eating French food very much.

3. is not used when , , * are the main verbs of sentences.

shàng xīnqī tā zài bĕijīng

星期 .

LAST WEEKHE WAS (IN) BEIJING

He was in Beijing last week.

yĭqián tā yŏu hĕn duō qián

以前 .

BEFORE HE HAD VERY MUCH MONEY

In the past he had a lot of money.

If (to posses) is used as the main verb of a sentence, (for completed action) is not used. However, can be used if the object of a sentence is an abstract one which has an implication of action, such as “development”, “improvement” 他的学习有了很大的进步. He has improved greatly in his studies.

4. is not used for direct and indirect speeches.

dir. speech zuótiān tā wèn wŏ: "nĭ yào qù zhōngguó ma"

昨天 他问 : " ?"

YESTERDAY HE ASK ME: "YOU WANT GO CHINA MA?"

Yesterday he asked me: "Would you like to go to China?"

indir. speech zuótiān tā wèn wŏ: yào qù zhōngguó ma

.

YESTERDAY HE ASK ME WANT GO CHINA MA

Yesterday he asked me if I would like to go to China.

As you can see, in the situations when the completed action is not used, time-words are used to indicate the actions happened in the past.

12. Is it true that if I use a time-word I don't have to use ?

No. Time-words are needed when the completed action cannot be used. But time-words have no effect on when the completed action is applicable.

zuótiān wŏqù măi le liăng bĕn shū

去买 .

TESTERDAY I GO BUY LE TWOBEN BOOK

Yesterday I went out and bought two books.

You can't say:

zuótiān wŏ qù măi liăng bĕn shū

去买 .

The above sentence sounds uncompleted. The listener would expect more and would ask, "and then what?"

13. Are there any constructions that cannot take an aspectual particle ?

The completed action is not applicable to the following constructions.

1. The V+ construction (the complement of degree)

zuótiān tā fàn zuòde hĕn bú cuò

YESTERDAY HE MEAL COOK DEVERY NOTBAD

Yesterday he cooked meal very well.

2. Description+ (The verbs in the descriptive clause don't take , as they are not the main verbs of sentences.)

zuótiān wŏ măi de nà bĕn shū hĕn yŏu yìsi

昨天 意思.

YESTERDAY I BUY DE THATBENBOOK VERY INTERESTING

The book which I bought yesterday is very interesting.

14. Do I always have to consider the use of when I see a past tense in an English sentence?

No, not always. Remember: the in this section is for completed actions, which is different from the past tense. Here is another example of a past tense English sentence which does not use the completed action :

qùnián wŏ fēicháng máng.

去年 .

LAST YEAR I VERY BUSY

Last year I was very busy.

The word busy acts as a stative verb which does not take the particle of completed action.

Exercises

You can submit your work online here

Click here for answers

A. Place "" in the right in the following sentences, and give your reasons if is not needed.

1. 昨天我去____大使馆办____签证____.

2. 我已经请____小王看____两次电影 ,可是他还是那么不客气____. 真气人____!

3. 上星期我去____北京看____朋友____.

4. 去年我常常在____路口的那家书店看____.从来没有人管________.

5. 前天晚上我在____你那儿吃____饭的时候,我听见____她拉____小提琴拉____得真好听____.

6. 十年前我在____中国住____ .

7. 我研究____计算机研究____四年____.

8. 那本书我已经看____三次____.

B. Translate the following sentences into Chinese.

1. Yesterday Xiao Wang asked me to borrow a Chinese newspaper from the library for him.

2. For three months Mr. Li has been teaching me how to sing Peking Opera.

3. I've been living in this country for more than four years.

4. We've gone through this lesson twice, but the teacher wants us to go through it once more.

5. She is unhappy. She hasn't eaten for two days.

6. He should have returned that tea-set a long time ago.

7. Last month he said that he wanted to go to China, but this month he said that he wanted to go to Japan. I really don't know where he wants to go.

8. In the past I was the only one who did the cooking.

9. Last year he often helped me to learn Chinese.

10. Should we go to the hospital to see Xiao Zhang immediately after finishing our work?



* He has been learning Chinese for 2 years.

** The at the end of the sentence indicates that the action is still going on. In this usage, brings the time "up to the present". This usage of only works when a time-measure or an implication of a time-measure is involved in the sentence. in the following examples have the similar function, which brings the time "up to the present".